PME Blog

California Rental Laws Are Changing: What SB 436 Means for Property Managers

Written by Anthony A. Luna | May 20, 2025 3:13:37 PM

 

California's legislators are once again reshaping the rental landscape. SB 436, positioned as a tenant protection measure, may end up doing more harm than good. For property managers, investors, and mom and pop landlords, this bill brings real consequences.

What Is SB 436?

SB 436 proposes several changes to the eviction process in California:

  • Extends the nonpayment notice period from 3 to 14 days

  • Restricts landlords' ability to reject third-party rent payments

  • Grants tenants the right to redeem once per year before lockout

While it may seem tenant-friendly, it creates administrative complications and longer holding periods for housing providers. With California eviction cases already taking 6–9 months, this bill adds more delay to an already slow process.

The True Cost of Delayed Evictions

One of our clients in Long Beach recently went through a 9-month eviction. The total loss exceeded $55,000—from unpaid rent to legal fees and unit rehabilitation.

Multiply that loss across a 10-unit portfolio, and you're looking at half a million dollars in operational drag.

Comparison: Mom & Pop Landlords vs Corporate Owners

Category Local Owners (Mom & Pop) Corporate Landlords
Response Time Fast, personal Delayed, call center-based
Tenant Relationships Direct, human-first Impersonal, transactional
Rent Increases Modest, flexible Aggressive, automatic
Community Investment High Low
SB 436 Tolerance Low High (due to legal budget)

The Bigger Picture: Consolidation of Rental Housing

The more friction we create for small landlords, the faster we invite institutional investors to dominate the housing market. This is how we lose local control of real estate.

  • More Red Tape → Fewer Local Landlords

  • Fewer Choices → Higher Rents

  • More Delays → Lower Housing Quality

How to Protect Your Business and Community

If you're a housing provider or property manager, here’s how to stay ahead:

  1. Update Your Eviction Protocols
    Ensure your templates, policies, and legal steps are SB 436-compliant.

  2. Adjust Your Budget Forecasts
    Plan for longer holding periods, vacancy losses, and higher legal reserves.

  3. Stay Connected to Advocacy Groups
    Organizations like the California Apartment Association are fighting for balance. Join the conversation.

  4. Communicate with Owners and Tenants
    Transparency helps set expectations—and strengthens trust across the board.

What Would an Owner Do?

At Property Management Excellence, we teach the Owner Mindset—thinking long-term, protecting assets, and managing with integrity.

SB 436 limits your ability to act swiftly and responsibly. It makes ethical management harder, not easier.

"Our job is to manage people’s legacies with integrity. That includes proactive care, clear communication, and systems that work—especially when stakes are high."

If we want better outcomes, we need smarter policies—not just slower ones.

More Resources:


Let’s Keep the Conversation Going

Have you experienced the impact of a delayed eviction? Are you seeing fewer mom and pop landlords in your neighborhood?

Drop your thoughts in the comments or share this with someone who needs to see it.

Want help navigating laws like SB 436 with a values-based approach?
Join the PME community or reach out to our team. We’re here to help you lead with clarity and confidence.